Corrections Policy

Accuracy and accountability are central to Coinphony’s identity.

As a global crypto-media publication, we understand that even small errors can mislead readers, distort market perception, or damage trust. This Corrections Policy outlines how Coinphony identifies, evaluates, and rectifies factual or contextual inaccuracies in our content.

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Coinphony strives to ensure that every article, chart, or opinion piece is based on verifiable facts and credible sources.
Editors, writers, and contributors must confirm information before publication through:

  • Cross-referencing multiple reputable sources.
  • Reviewing official data such as on-chain analytics, company filings, and government releases.
  • Independent fact-checking by editorial staff prior to publication.

When an error slips through, we correct it quickly, transparently, and without external pressure.

Scope of Corrections

We classify updates into three categories:

  1. Minor Edits – Typographical or grammatical fixes that do not alter meaning. These are corrected silently without a public note.
  2. Standard Corrections – Factual inaccuracies, incorrect figures, misattributed quotes, or missing context that affect understanding but not the overall premise. These receive a correction note at the bottom of the article.
  3. Major Corrections / Retractions – Errors that materially change conclusions, misrepresent events, or publish unverifiable claims. These trigger a visible “Correction” or “Retraction” label at the top of the story, accompanied by an explanation and timestamp.

All corrections remain permanently attached to the article for accountability.

How We Identify Errors

Corrections may originate from:

  • Reader feedback sent to info@coinphony.com
  • Editorial review or internal audits
  • Source clarifications or updated public data
  • Legal or compliance requests

Every reported issue is logged in Coinphony’s internal correction register. Editors review new reports daily and determine the appropriate classification and response.

Correction Workflow

  1. Review: An editor evaluates the claim and checks the original material.
  2. Verification: The fact is re-checked against the original source or updated evidence.
  3. Decision: The editor decides whether to issue a note, update, or retraction.
  4. Update: The article is edited, and a correction notice is added.
  5. Documentation: The correction is logged internally for quality tracking.

All verified corrections are completed within two business days whenever possible.

Transparency in Published Notes

Correction notes appear in a clear, consistent format such as:

Correction (Nov 1 2025): This article previously misstated the date of Ethereum’s Dencun upgrade. It occurred on March 13 2024, not March 31 2024. The story has been updated accordingly.

This format ensures readers know exactly what changed and why.

Retractions and Takedowns

Coinphony will issue a retraction only when content is proven false, unethical, or legally problematic and cannot be corrected through revision.

Retractions are rare and must be approved by the Chief Editor. The retracted piece remains online with a clear explanation instead of being silently removed.

We do not remove content merely because it is unfavorable or disputed by external parties unless a factual error is demonstrated.

Reader Participation

We encourage readers to participate in our quality process. If you spot an error or have additional evidence, email info@coinphony.com with:

  • The article URL
  • A description of the issue
  • Supporting documentation or links

Our editorial team will investigate and respond, confirming whether a correction or clarification is warranted.

Legal and Regulatory Requests

When corrections are requested by regulatory bodies, corporate representatives, or legal counsel, Coinphony follows the same verification standards applied to all readers.

We will not alter or retract content solely on demand; evidence must substantiate the claim.
Legal correspondence is archived for audit purposes.

Continuous Improvement

Coinphony conducts quarterly audits of published content to:

  • Identify recurring types of factual or sourcing errors.
  • Evaluate performance of writers and editors against our editorial standards.
  • Update training materials for contributors.

These internal reviews help strengthen our long-term editorial reliability.

Accountability

Every published article lists the author’s name and the editor’s initials. This shared visibility reinforces responsibility throughout the editorial chain.

Coinphony’s guiding belief is simple: credibility is earned through transparency.

Our correction system reflects that principle by ensuring that our record of truth evolves with integrity and openness.